RE: ZM sourcecode

[worbat]

Touqen is also available too so he can possibly help Dev out with that.

His pc is borked, for now. But yes a good idea.

[Bad King Urgrain]

I should clarify that I was not necessarily suggesting you work on ZM while also working on ZMI. My main point was that it is a bad idea to take the ZM source, update it, and release it as a new version of Zombie Master (eg. 1.3.0). Instead, it should be clearly separate as it is then developed by different people. One way would be to release it as ZMI 1.0. You could also give it a name of its own. So more of a naming thing than a development thing.

Anyway, I actually think it would be better to focus all resources on an OB version ASAP. There's not much low hanging fruit in ZM 1.2.1, bugfix-wise. Better off starting clean than trying to figure out obscure bugs.

[LokiFoki]

Since 1.2.1 is pretty much bugfree, aside from some server instabilities, there is no real need to update it. Adding new content or features to the ep1 version is just a waste of time and ressources.

We all know that this mod can live longer than a year without updates. I have no problem with waiting for tanners zmi. I wonder if touqen and /dev/null can participate in coding. As long as tanner is working on the "master"-part of the game they could do the suvivors or other stuff.

[Marauder8]

It's nice to see some more progress, this thread makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.

[Joest]

It's from nearly a month ago.

[AndyTheGeeky]

It's from nearly a month ago.

That would be the joke, yes.

[worbat]

It's also the wrong thread.

[Marauder8]

Wait what? If this thread was from over a month ago why did it show up as having a new post?

[OneTooManyZombies]

Wait what? If this thread was from over a month ago why did it show up as having a new post?

Deleted post?

[Rukus]

Anything on the news front concerning this thread, or is it a juicy piece of meat left out to rot?

[McViolent]

/Thread.